source categories
One proposed workspace for conversations, records, reviews, notes, and repository context.
Loading MyDataNinja…
Customer evidence × delivery — private preview
From customer evidence to review-ready software.
MyDataNinja gathers customer evidence, preserves commercial context, shapes approved requirements, and prepares each implementation proposal for human review.
SupportCallsCRMReviewsGitHubProduct notesand more
The friction
Evidence arrives everywhere. Decisions still happen in fragments.
Signals lose their source, commercial context sits in another system, and delivery begins from a summary nobody can fully inspect. MyDataNinja is being designed to keep that chain visible.
review gates
Human checkpoints across connection, prioritization, requirements, and implementation.
decision record
A traceable thread from customer evidence to the change your team chooses to review.
Decision intelligence
Every signal stays connected to its source.
The planned workflow preserves where evidence came from, what it may influence, and which assumptions still need a person to resolve.
01 · Understand
Bring scattered evidence into one inspectable view.
Review support conversations, call notes, CRM context, and feedback without hiding the original signal behind a score.
- Source excerpts remain visible
- Account context stays attached
- Suggested themes remain reviewable
02 · Decide
Prioritize with the context behind the number.
Compare opportunity strength, evidence coverage, affected accounts, and delivery confidence before your team commits.
- Assumptions are labeled
- Commercial context is visible
- Approval remains explicit
03 · Prepare
Research the codebase before proposing a change.
Map approved requirements to relevant repositories, modules, and ownership boundaries in a future scoped pilot.
- Repository scope is agreed first
- Related surfaces are explained
- Merge authority never moves
Build with boundaries
Move faster without making the work opaque.
Each proposed capability is designed around reviewable context, explicit limits, and human control.
Evidence brief
See the source excerpts, affected accounts, and open questions behind the proposed priority.
Requirements
Turn an approved direction into acceptance criteria while keeping assumptions visibly separate.
Approval gates
Require a person to approve consequential transitions before analysis or implementation continues.
Scoped research
Limit repository research to the code surfaces agreed for a future pilot.
Build review
Inspect a proposed diff, test evidence, and unresolved risks before your team decides what happens next.
Visible limits
Define job, spend, and environment boundaries before any metered build workflow begins.
How it works
A visible path from signal to proposal.
This is the operating model planned for design-partner pilots; it is not an already-connected production service.
Connect the evidence
Choose the conversations, records, reviews, and notes that should inform product decisions.
Inspect the pattern
Review grouped signals beside their original source and account context.
Approve the direction
Select one opportunity and record why it deserves attention now.
Shape the change
Draft requirements, constraints, and review checks from the approved evidence.
Review the proposal
Evaluate implementation evidence while merge authority stays with your team.
Private preview
Show us where your strongest product evidence lives.
Tell us about the systems, decision, or delivery bottleneck you want to examine. We review every request before discussing access.